A 1938 Studebaker, reportedly, weighs approximately 3,250lbs. That weight is divided over four wheels designed to bear 3,250lbs. If we can assume that the surface area, touching the road, of each wheel is 5 inches in width and 7 inches in length. The surface area would, then, be 35 inches. If we multiplied that surface area by itself, and then, divided that by the overall weight of the Studebaker divided by the four wheels. That is represented as 35 times 35 (1,225) divided by 812.5. That tells us that the Surface Pressure acting on each wheel of the Studebaker is 1.5 degrees.
Superman’s hands are drawn grasping the fenders on either side of the Studebaker, suggesting that all of the Studebaker’s Surface Pressure is being concentrated on the palms of Superman’s hands and on those two side fender. It is unknown how large or small Superman’s hands might’ve been but for the sake of argument I’m estimating that Superman’s hands were 7 inches long by 4 inches wide. This can be represented by as 28 times 28 (784) divided by 1625 (the weight of the Studebaker divided by Superman’s two hands), which would come out to 2.07 inches of Surface Pressure. This is interesting because if the Surface Pressure acting on an object is greater than the Tensile Strength, which I will address soon, said object will break. In the real-world, that Surface Pressure acting on those Side fenders would cause the fenders to rip off and for the Studebaker to come crashing down on Superman’s head.
Back Issues
-
►
2015
(6)
- ► March 2015 (2)
- ► February 2015 (4)
-
►
2014
(44)
- ► November 2014 (1)
- ► October 2014 (1)
- ► September 2014 (2)
- ► August 2014 (1)
- ► April 2014 (5)
- ► March 2014 (6)
- ► February 2014 (9)
- ► January 2014 (6)
-
▼
2013
(69)
- ▼ December 2013 (8)
- ► November 2013 (5)
- ► October 2013 (7)
- ► September 2013 (10)
- ► August 2013 (8)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (12)
- ► February 2013 (2)
- ► January 2013 (3)
-
►
2012
(80)
- ► December 2012 (11)
- ► November 2012 (8)
- ► October 2012 (10)
- ► September 2012 (7)
- ► August 2012 (7)
- ► April 2012 (1)
- ► March 2012 (6)
- ► February 2012 (3)
- ► January 2012 (8)
-
►
2011
(64)
- ► December 2011 (3)
- ► November 2011 (2)
- ► October 2011 (4)
- ► September 2011 (11)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (4)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (3)
-
►
2010
(11)
- ► December 2010 (11)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment